<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 137 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203267</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by the revenue, reversing the CIT(A)&#039;s order regarding the addition of Rs. 62,13,027 related to the fair market value and book value difference upon dissolution. The matter was remanded to the AO for fresh computation of capital gains. Additionally, the issue of disallowance of labour charges was remanded to the CIT(A) for further consideration on the genuineness of the expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 11:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 137 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203267</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by the revenue, reversing the CIT(A)&#039;s order regarding the addition of Rs. 62,13,027 related to the fair market value and book value difference upon dissolution. The matter was remanded to the AO for fresh computation of capital gains. Additionally, the issue of disallowance of labour charges was remanded to the CIT(A) for further consideration on the genuineness of the expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>