<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 133 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203237</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, upholding the decision of the Tribunal that the assessee validly received goods and was entitled to claim Cenvat Credit. Despite missing consignor details in invoices, substantial evidence like octroi receipts and transportation documents confirmed receipt. The court emphasized that the absence of consignor information did not negate the evidence of actual receipt. The judgment underscored the importance of considering the overall evidence in such cases and upheld the validity of the assessee&#039;s claim based on the presented evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 10:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 133 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203237</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, upholding the decision of the Tribunal that the assessee validly received goods and was entitled to claim Cenvat Credit. Despite missing consignor details in invoices, substantial evidence like octroi receipts and transportation documents confirmed receipt. The court emphasized that the absence of consignor information did not negate the evidence of actual receipt. The judgment underscored the importance of considering the overall evidence in such cases and upheld the validity of the assessee&#039;s claim based on the presented evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>