<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 53 - ALLAHABAD  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203217</link>
    <description>The court affirmed the mandatory nature of the penalty under Section 11AC, emphasizing that once applicable, the penalty must equal the duty determined under Section 11A(2). The court upheld the appellate authority&#039;s decision, noting no suppression of facts or misstatement by the respondent, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 14:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 53 - ALLAHABAD  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203217</link>
      <description>The court affirmed the mandatory nature of the penalty under Section 11AC, emphasizing that once applicable, the penalty must equal the duty determined under Section 11A(2). The court upheld the appellate authority&#039;s decision, noting no suppression of facts or misstatement by the respondent, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>