<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 52 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203214</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras directed the release of Second Hand Digital Multifunction Print and Copying Machines detained during investigations upon the respondents depositing 40% of the enhanced value and paying applicable duty, with an assurance of completing adjudication proceedings within 15 days. The Court imposed conditions similar to previous cases, with the petitioner required to deposit 25% of the enhanced value and cooperate fully in the adjudication process. The judgment emphasized cooperation in adjudication proceedings, aiming to balance the release of goods with legal compliance. The writ petition was disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 17:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176780" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 52 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203214</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras directed the release of Second Hand Digital Multifunction Print and Copying Machines detained during investigations upon the respondents depositing 40% of the enhanced value and paying applicable duty, with an assurance of completing adjudication proceedings within 15 days. The Court imposed conditions similar to previous cases, with the petitioner required to deposit 25% of the enhanced value and cooperate fully in the adjudication process. The judgment emphasized cooperation in adjudication proceedings, aiming to balance the release of goods with legal compliance. The writ petition was disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>