<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 40 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203188</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision denying a leasing company&#039;s claim for a higher depreciation rate of 50% on leased vehicles, ruling that the company was not engaged in the business of running vehicles on hire as required by the Income-tax Rules. The Court distinguished between &quot;lease&quot; and &quot;hire,&quot; affirming that the appellant&#039;s leasing business did not qualify for the higher depreciation rate. The appellant&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the Tribunal&#039;s decision allowing depreciation at the rate of 33.33% was upheld, resulting in a judgment in favor of the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 16:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 40 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203188</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision denying a leasing company&#039;s claim for a higher depreciation rate of 50% on leased vehicles, ruling that the company was not engaged in the business of running vehicles on hire as required by the Income-tax Rules. The Court distinguished between &quot;lease&quot; and &quot;hire,&quot; affirming that the appellant&#039;s leasing business did not qualify for the higher depreciation rate. The appellant&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the Tribunal&#039;s decision allowing depreciation at the rate of 33.33% was upheld, resulting in a judgment in favor of the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>