<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 237 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203182</link>
    <description>Industrial units in a tax free zone relied on a governmental incentive promising 100% exemption from excise duty; courts applied the doctrine of promissory estoppel, finding that reliance-induced investment prevents unilateral withdrawal of the exemption and preserves benefits for bona fide manufacturers. The State may, however, pursue targeted enforcement against identified instances of bogus production without general withdrawal of the exemption. The analysis focuses on policy-induced reliance, estoppel against rescission, and case-specific anti-fraud measures affecting excise exemption entitlement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 11:23:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 237 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203182</link>
      <description>Industrial units in a tax free zone relied on a governmental incentive promising 100% exemption from excise duty; courts applied the doctrine of promissory estoppel, finding that reliance-induced investment prevents unilateral withdrawal of the exemption and preserves benefits for bona fide manufacturers. The State may, however, pursue targeted enforcement against identified instances of bogus production without general withdrawal of the exemption. The analysis focuses on policy-induced reliance, estoppel against rescission, and case-specific anti-fraud measures affecting excise exemption entitlement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>