<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 94 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203180</link>
    <description>The court quashed the show cause notice and directed the LTU to include all of the petitioner&#039;s units under the LTU scheme since inception, emphasizing the scheme&#039;s facilitative nature and the need for discretion in such matters. The court asserted jurisdiction to entertain the Writ Petition, highlighting the proactive role required of the Chief Commissioner in resolving issues and ensuring all units are governed by the LTU scheme from the beginning.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2014 16:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176746" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 94 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203180</link>
      <description>The court quashed the show cause notice and directed the LTU to include all of the petitioner&#039;s units under the LTU scheme since inception, emphasizing the scheme&#039;s facilitative nature and the need for discretion in such matters. The court asserted jurisdiction to entertain the Writ Petition, highlighting the proactive role required of the Chief Commissioner in resolving issues and ensuring all units are governed by the LTU scheme from the beginning.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>