https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203179 The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the repeated non-appearance of the applicant, failure to update the address for service of notice, and lack of representation by the learned Advocate. Despite the recall of the ex-parte order, procedural concerns arose as the applicant was absent during the passing of the order. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of active participation and compliance with procedural requirements in legal proceedings, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. en-us Thu, 13 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Mar 2011 17:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203179 The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the repeated non-appearance of the applicant, failure to update the address for service of notice, and lack of representation by the learned Advocate. Despite the recall of the ex-parte order, procedural concerns arose as the applicant was absent during the passing of the order. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of active participation and compliance with procedural requirements in legal proceedings, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 13 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203179