<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 463 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203178</link>
    <description>Imported seashells were treated as classifiable under heading 0307, and on that factual basis the import policy did not impose any restriction on their import. The recommendation of the wildlife authority was held not to be the governing factor for deciding confiscability under customs law. As the goods were not shown to be prohibited or restricted, no substantial question of law arose for admission of the appeal, and the appeal was not entertainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 09:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 463 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203178</link>
      <description>Imported seashells were treated as classifiable under heading 0307, and on that factual basis the import policy did not impose any restriction on their import. The recommendation of the wildlife authority was held not to be the governing factor for deciding confiscability under customs law. As the goods were not shown to be prohibited or restricted, no substantial question of law arose for admission of the appeal, and the appeal was not entertainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>