<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 233 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203177</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the compensation received by the assessee for relinquishing his rights in the Nigam property should be classified as &quot;capital gains.&quot; The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to assess the compensation under the head of &quot;capital gains&quot; and allow permissible deductions. The appeal was partly allowed in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that the transaction involved the relinquishment of a capital asset, not a business activity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 07:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 233 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203177</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the compensation received by the assessee for relinquishing his rights in the Nigam property should be classified as &quot;capital gains.&quot; The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to assess the compensation under the head of &quot;capital gains&quot; and allow permissible deductions. The appeal was partly allowed in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that the transaction involved the relinquishment of a capital asset, not a business activity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203177</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>