<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 181 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203161</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, set aside the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals)&#039;s order rejecting an appeal as time-barred due to a 32-day delay. The Tribunal accepted the appellant&#039;s argument that the delay resulted from filing the appeal before the wrong forum, excluding this period from the delay calculation. The matter was remanded for reconsideration of the condonation of delay application, emphasizing the importance of filing appeals before the correct forum to avoid jurisdictional errors and delays. The Tribunal did not express a view on the condonation issue, allowing the appellant to present arguments before the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 08:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 181 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203161</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, set aside the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals)&#039;s order rejecting an appeal as time-barred due to a 32-day delay. The Tribunal accepted the appellant&#039;s argument that the delay resulted from filing the appeal before the wrong forum, excluding this period from the delay calculation. The matter was remanded for reconsideration of the condonation of delay application, emphasizing the importance of filing appeals before the correct forum to avoid jurisdictional errors and delays. The Tribunal did not express a view on the condonation issue, allowing the appellant to present arguments before the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>