<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 386 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203152</link>
    <description>The petition was adjourned for hearing and final disposal on the next date, while the ad-interim protection was continued in the meantime. Continuation of that protection was limited to specified members who filed the required undertaking within the stipulated time regarding payment of service tax dues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 23:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176719" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 386 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203152</link>
      <description>The petition was adjourned for hearing and final disposal on the next date, while the ad-interim protection was continued in the meantime. Continuation of that protection was limited to specified members who filed the required undertaking within the stipulated time regarding payment of service tax dues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>