<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 461 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203151</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay ordered to examine the constitutional validity of specific provisions of the Finance Act, 1994 as amended in 2010. The Attorney General of India and respondents were scheduled for a hearing on 3rd August, 2010. No coercive measures for service tax recovery were permitted until the next hearing, which was set to be heard concurrently with another writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176718" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 461 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203151</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay ordered to examine the constitutional validity of specific provisions of the Finance Act, 1994 as amended in 2010. The Attorney General of India and respondents were scheduled for a hearing on 3rd August, 2010. No coercive measures for service tax recovery were permitted until the next hearing, which was set to be heard concurrently with another writ petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>