<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 227 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203148</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, set aside the impugned order, and remanded the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh decision. The Tribunal emphasized the need to establish default by the assessee before addressing the extended period of limitation issue and directed the Commissioner to consider all issues raised in the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 00:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 227 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203148</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, set aside the impugned order, and remanded the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh decision. The Tribunal emphasized the need to establish default by the assessee before addressing the extended period of limitation issue and directed the Commissioner to consider all issues raised in the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>