<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 59 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203128</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the orders dropping duty demand on notional interest added to the amount received by the respondent from customers. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected as it failed to prove that the advances received depressed the sale price of goods. The decision emphasized the necessity of establishing a nexus between advances taken and prices charged, in line with the precedent set by the Hon&#039;ble Apex Court in VST Inds. The inclusion of notional interest in the assessable value was deemed unwarranted without evidence of impact on sale prices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 22:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 59 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203128</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the orders dropping duty demand on notional interest added to the amount received by the respondent from customers. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected as it failed to prove that the advances received depressed the sale price of goods. The decision emphasized the necessity of establishing a nexus between advances taken and prices charged, in line with the precedent set by the Hon&#039;ble Apex Court in VST Inds. The inclusion of notional interest in the assessable value was deemed unwarranted without evidence of impact on sale prices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>