https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203126 The Court held that the non-joining of the CHA in the show cause notice did not vitiate the disciplinary action against the CHA under CHALR 1984. The Court found the punishment of license cancellation disproportionate, setting it aside but maintaining the forfeiture of the security deposit. The action taken against the CHA was deemed unjustified due to contributory fault on both sides. The appeal was partly allowed with no order as to costs. en-us Wed, 06 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 08 May 2011 22:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203126 The Court held that the non-joining of the CHA in the show cause notice did not vitiate the disciplinary action against the CHA under CHALR 1984. The Court found the punishment of license cancellation disproportionate, setting it aside but maintaining the forfeiture of the security deposit. The action taken against the CHA was deemed unjustified due to contributory fault on both sides. The appeal was partly allowed with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 06 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203126