<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 217 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203121</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, granting exemption under Section 54 of the I.T. Act to the assessee for the disallowed claim of Rs. 95 lakhs. The Tribunal also directed the Assessing Officer to verify the correct date of property acquisition for the addition of Rs. 8,05,787 to the assessee&#039;s income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 09:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 217 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203121</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, granting exemption under Section 54 of the I.T. Act to the assessee for the disallowed claim of Rs. 95 lakhs. The Tribunal also directed the Assessing Officer to verify the correct date of property acquisition for the addition of Rs. 8,05,787 to the assessee&#039;s income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>