<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 214 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203114</link>
    <description>The court decided ex-parte as the respondent did not appear. The issue of interest on duty paid supplementary invoices due to price escalation was settled in favor of the Revenue, following a precedent set by the Supreme Court in a previous case involving SKF India Ltd. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the original order was restored, allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The cross objection was also disposed of during the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 09:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 214 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203114</link>
      <description>The court decided ex-parte as the respondent did not appear. The issue of interest on duty paid supplementary invoices due to price escalation was settled in favor of the Revenue, following a precedent set by the Supreme Court in a previous case involving SKF India Ltd. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the original order was restored, allowing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The cross objection was also disposed of during the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203114</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>