https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203108 The Tribunal treated the appellants' substantial duty deposit as sufficient for waiver of the balance pre-deposit and, because the Revenue's case rested on circulars later stated to have been quashed by the High Court, held that the matter should be reconsidered afresh. The impugned order was set aside and the original adjudicating authority was directed to decide the dispute again in light of the law declared by the High Court. en-us Mon, 24 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 May 2011 10:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203108 The Tribunal treated the appellants' substantial duty deposit as sufficient for waiver of the balance pre-deposit and, because the Revenue's case rested on circulars later stated to have been quashed by the High Court, held that the matter should be reconsidered afresh. The impugned order was set aside and the original adjudicating authority was directed to decide the dispute again in light of the law declared by the High Court. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 24 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203108