<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 451 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203095</link>
    <description>The judgment addressed appeals challenging duty and penalty imposition by the original authority. The Commissioner (Appeals) differentiated between inward and outward freight, allowing credit for service tax paid on inward freight but denying it for outward freight. The appellants were granted credit for inward freight but not for outward freight, leading to a waiver of dues and a stay on recovery pending appeal decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 09:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 451 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203095</link>
      <description>The judgment addressed appeals challenging duty and penalty imposition by the original authority. The Commissioner (Appeals) differentiated between inward and outward freight, allowing credit for service tax paid on inward freight but denying it for outward freight. The appellants were granted credit for inward freight but not for outward freight, leading to a waiver of dues and a stay on recovery pending appeal decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>