<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 206 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203087</link>
    <description>Prolonged suspension of a Customs House Agent licence was held unjustified where the material was based largely on uncorroborated statements, there was no evidence of an authorised person signing or handing over blank shipping bills, and the contemplated enquiry had not begun in time. The alleged use of the licence by another person was not supported by independent proof of the CHA&#039;s knowing participation, while the omission to intimate additional directors was treated as a minor lapse. The baggage-related allegation also required enquiry before any adverse conclusion. The suspension was set aside, while the department remained free to proceed in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 206 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203087</link>
      <description>Prolonged suspension of a Customs House Agent licence was held unjustified where the material was based largely on uncorroborated statements, there was no evidence of an authorised person signing or handing over blank shipping bills, and the contemplated enquiry had not begun in time. The alleged use of the licence by another person was not supported by independent proof of the CHA&#039;s knowing participation, while the omission to intimate additional directors was treated as a minor lapse. The baggage-related allegation also required enquiry before any adverse conclusion. The suspension was set aside, while the department remained free to proceed in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>