<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 432 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203071</link>
    <description>An interim customs appeal issue concerned whether pre-deposit could be waived and whether an existing bank guarantee could serve as adequate security during pendency of the appeal. The exemption notification was read as covering aircraft used for both non-scheduled passenger services and non-scheduled charter services, which gave the appellant an arguable case at the interim stage. The bank guarantee furnished under an earlier High Court arrangement toward the duty component was treated as sufficient security for the differential customs duty. On that basis, further pre-deposit was dispensed with while the appeal remained pending.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 10:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 432 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203071</link>
      <description>An interim customs appeal issue concerned whether pre-deposit could be waived and whether an existing bank guarantee could serve as adequate security during pendency of the appeal. The exemption notification was read as covering aircraft used for both non-scheduled passenger services and non-scheduled charter services, which gave the appellant an arguable case at the interim stage. The bank guarantee furnished under an earlier High Court arrangement toward the duty component was treated as sufficient security for the differential customs duty. On that basis, further pre-deposit was dispensed with while the appeal remained pending.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>