https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203056 The appeal by the appellant company was dismissed, affirming the classification of the product under Chapter 39 and the extension of the limitation period due to misstatement. However, the penalties imposed on the company managers were overturned as there was insufficient evidence of their involvement in the misstatement. The Tribunal's decision was grounded in the detailed analysis of the product's classification and the adequacy of the appellants' declarations. en-us Tue, 08 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 May 2011 09:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203056 The appeal by the appellant company was dismissed, affirming the classification of the product under Chapter 39 and the extension of the limitation period due to misstatement. However, the penalties imposed on the company managers were overturned as there was insufficient evidence of their involvement in the misstatement. The Tribunal's decision was grounded in the detailed analysis of the product's classification and the adequacy of the appellants' declarations. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 08 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203056