<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 119 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203045</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the disallowance of the deduction of Rs. 21,80,640 paid for non-use charges in computing capital gain. It determined that the penalty for non-use was not directly related to the transfer of the plots and did not qualify as a cost of improvement. The ITAT dismissed the appeal, emphasizing that the payment was to protect title and possession, not for improving the capital asset.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 19:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 119 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203045</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the disallowance of the deduction of Rs. 21,80,640 paid for non-use charges in computing capital gain. It determined that the penalty for non-use was not directly related to the transfer of the plots and did not qualify as a cost of improvement. The ITAT dismissed the appeal, emphasizing that the payment was to protect title and possession, not for improving the capital asset.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>