<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 619 - ITAT BILASPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203042</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the addition of Rs. 7,74,14,352 based on TDS certificates was dismissed by the Tribunal. The CIT(A) deleted the addition after considering submissions and applying AS-7 for revenue recognition, emphasizing that income accrual is not solely based on receipt but on the legal right to receive income. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, stating that the mobilization advance should not be treated as income until services are rendered, aligning with accounting standards and legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 19:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 619 - ITAT BILASPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203042</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the addition of Rs. 7,74,14,352 based on TDS certificates was dismissed by the Tribunal. The CIT(A) deleted the addition after considering submissions and applying AS-7 for revenue recognition, emphasizing that income accrual is not solely based on receipt but on the legal right to receive income. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, stating that the mobilization advance should not be treated as income until services are rendered, aligning with accounting standards and legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>