<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 33 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203039</link>
    <description>The court set aside the pre-deposit order of Rs.20.00 lakhs imposed by the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on the appellant, who was held liable for Rs.46.00 lakhs despite disassociating himself from the firm in question. Considering the appellant&#039;s age, health, lack of personal income, and the Rs.5.00 lakhs already deposited, the court found the additional pre-deposit unjustified and overturned it. The court emphasized that its decision on the pre-deposit order does not reflect its views on the case&#039;s merits, leaving the appellate authority to decide the appeal on its own merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2014 12:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 33 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203039</link>
      <description>The court set aside the pre-deposit order of Rs.20.00 lakhs imposed by the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on the appellant, who was held liable for Rs.46.00 lakhs despite disassociating himself from the firm in question. Considering the appellant&#039;s age, health, lack of personal income, and the Rs.5.00 lakhs already deposited, the court found the additional pre-deposit unjustified and overturned it. The court emphasized that its decision on the pre-deposit order does not reflect its views on the case&#039;s merits, leaving the appellate authority to decide the appeal on its own merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>