<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 374 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203037</link>
    <description>The appellants were engaged in manufacturing man-made processed knitted fabrics and claimed concessional duty under Notification No. 14/2002-C.E. The issue centered on their eligibility for this rate. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of actual duty payment to avail benefits under the notification. Relying on Explanation II of the Notification and precedents, it clarified that duty payment on textile fabrics was essential. The Tribunal upheld the challenge to penalty imposition, citing the interpretative nature of the issue. Consequently, the penalty was set aside, and the appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 374 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203037</link>
      <description>The appellants were engaged in manufacturing man-made processed knitted fabrics and claimed concessional duty under Notification No. 14/2002-C.E. The issue centered on their eligibility for this rate. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of actual duty payment to avail benefits under the notification. Relying on Explanation II of the Notification and precedents, it clarified that duty payment on textile fabrics was essential. The Tribunal upheld the challenge to penalty imposition, citing the interpretative nature of the issue. Consequently, the penalty was set aside, and the appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>