https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203035 The tribunal upheld the duty demand of Rs.96,985 on the appellant, Shri B.M.Saravanan, proprietor of M/s.Lal Industries, for using the brand name of Alpha, owned by M/s.Alpha Electronics, on manufactured goods. The evidence, including the appellant's admission and corroboration, established the clearance of branded goods, leading to the rejection of the appeal. The duty demand, interest, and penalties imposed on the appellant were sustained, as the appellant was deemed ineligible for the benefit of the SSI notification due to the clearance of branded goods. en-us Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203035 The tribunal upheld the duty demand of Rs.96,985 on the appellant, Shri B.M.Saravanan, proprietor of M/s.Lal Industries, for using the brand name of Alpha, owned by M/s.Alpha Electronics, on manufactured goods. The evidence, including the appellant's admission and corroboration, established the clearance of branded goods, leading to the rejection of the appeal. The duty demand, interest, and penalties imposed on the appellant were sustained, as the appellant was deemed ineligible for the benefit of the SSI notification due to the clearance of branded goods. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203035