<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 191 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203029</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, particularly on the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS on transaction and V-sat charges. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was also partly allowed, particularly regarding the protective addition of Rs. 37,95,700. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was announced on 3rd December 2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 13:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 191 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203029</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, particularly on the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS on transaction and V-sat charges. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was also partly allowed, particularly regarding the protective addition of Rs. 37,95,700. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was announced on 3rd December 2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>