<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 151 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203025</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to determine the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) for the net transaction of Rs. 94 lakhs using the Resale Price Method (RPM) with appropriate comparables. If the variance is less than 5%, no adjustment should be made. The Tribunal emphasized that ALP adjustments should only be made for international transactions and set aside the issue for fresh adjudication. The appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 12:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176595" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 151 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203025</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to determine the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) for the net transaction of Rs. 94 lakhs using the Resale Price Method (RPM) with appropriate comparables. If the variance is less than 5%, no adjustment should be made. The Tribunal emphasized that ALP adjustments should only be made for international transactions and set aside the issue for fresh adjudication. The appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>