https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203017 The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer seeking remission of duty on destroyed goods. Despite lower authorities denying the claim due to lack of care in safeguarding the goods, the tribunal found the goods unfit for human consumption and entitled to remission under Rule 21 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. Relying on a test report and precedent, the tribunal granted the remission claim, providing consequential relief to the appellant. en-us Mon, 27 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 01 May 2011 21:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203017 The appellate tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer seeking remission of duty on destroyed goods. Despite lower authorities denying the claim due to lack of care in safeguarding the goods, the tribunal found the goods unfit for human consumption and entitled to remission under Rule 21 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. Relying on a test report and precedent, the tribunal granted the remission claim, providing consequential relief to the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 27 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203017