<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 9 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203015</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision in a case concerning excess abatement claimed by the assessee, resulting in a differential duty payable. The Tribunal relied on the apex court&#039;s ruling that if actual freight paid is less than equalized freight collected, the differential duty should not be included in the assessable value. Citing precedent cases, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the lower authority&#039;s decision based on the direct applicability of the apex court&#039;s judgment in similar circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 21:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 9 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203015</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision in a case concerning excess abatement claimed by the assessee, resulting in a differential duty payable. The Tribunal relied on the apex court&#039;s ruling that if actual freight paid is less than equalized freight collected, the differential duty should not be included in the assessable value. Citing precedent cases, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the lower authority&#039;s decision based on the direct applicability of the apex court&#039;s judgment in similar circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203015</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>