<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 148 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203007</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reversed the disallowance of interest payment by the assessee, emphasizing the commercial expediency and business interest behind the advertisement expenditure incurred, as per the S.A. Builders case. The decision favored the assessee, highlighting the justifiability of the interest-free advance provided to the holding company for business purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 148 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203007</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reversed the disallowance of interest payment by the assessee, emphasizing the commercial expediency and business interest behind the advertisement expenditure incurred, as per the S.A. Builders case. The decision favored the assessee, highlighting the justifiability of the interest-free advance provided to the holding company for business purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>