<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 187 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203000</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case concerning rebate claims under Rule 5 of Export of Service Rules 2005. Despite filing the refund claim in the wrong form and discrepancies in details, the Tribunal found that all necessary documents were provided, clarifying the nature of the refund. The Tribunal emphasized the rectifiability of clerical errors in refund claims and remanded the case for further assessment by the original adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 13:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 187 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203000</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case concerning rebate claims under Rule 5 of Export of Service Rules 2005. Despite filing the refund claim in the wrong form and discrepancies in details, the Tribunal found that all necessary documents were provided, clarifying the nature of the refund. The Tribunal emphasized the rectifiability of clerical errors in refund claims and remanded the case for further assessment by the original adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>