<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 144 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202999</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, set aside the impugned order against Mrs. Archana Wadhwa, remanding the matter to the Commissioner for a fresh decision in line with precedent. The Tribunal determined that the demand against the appellant and others jointly was not legally justified, leading to the disposal of stay petitions and appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 144 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202999</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, set aside the impugned order against Mrs. Archana Wadhwa, remanding the matter to the Commissioner for a fresh decision in line with precedent. The Tribunal determined that the demand against the appellant and others jointly was not legally justified, leading to the disposal of stay petitions and appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>