<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 424 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202988</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the share broker assessee is entitled to a deduction under Section 36(1)(vii) for bad debts if the brokerage/commission income from related transactions was included in taxable income. The case was remanded to the Assessing Officer for verifying the quantification of the bad debt deduction, including margin money adjustments and sale proceeds of undelivered shares. Both appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 07:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 424 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202988</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the share broker assessee is entitled to a deduction under Section 36(1)(vii) for bad debts if the brokerage/commission income from related transactions was included in taxable income. The case was remanded to the Assessing Officer for verifying the quantification of the bad debt deduction, including margin money adjustments and sale proceeds of undelivered shares. Both appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>