<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 441 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202958</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the appellate Commissioner&#039;s decision based on the interpretation of Notification No. 21/99-C.E. (N.T.) and Notification No. 5/94-C.E. (N.T.). The appellant&#039;s claim for excess CENVAT credit was deemed inadmissible, and they were directed to reverse the amount claimed in their CENVAT account, with potential recovery of the inadmissible credit as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 11:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 441 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202958</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the appellate Commissioner&#039;s decision based on the interpretation of Notification No. 21/99-C.E. (N.T.) and Notification No. 5/94-C.E. (N.T.). The appellant&#039;s claim for excess CENVAT credit was deemed inadmissible, and they were directed to reverse the amount claimed in their CENVAT account, with potential recovery of the inadmissible credit as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>