<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 128 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202953</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT (Appeals) regarding the disallowance of the deduction claimed under section 80-IC of the Income-tax Act. It was determined that the standing charges received by the assessee were considered ancillary profits and not directly derived from manufacturing activities, as required for eligibility under section 80-IC. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed, and the assessee was not entitled to the deduction for the amount of Rs. 1,05,09,877.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 128 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202953</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT (Appeals) regarding the disallowance of the deduction claimed under section 80-IC of the Income-tax Act. It was determined that the standing charges received by the assessee were considered ancillary profits and not directly derived from manufacturing activities, as required for eligibility under section 80-IC. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed, and the assessee was not entitled to the deduction for the amount of Rs. 1,05,09,877.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>