https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202948 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the services provided did not fall under 'manpower recruitment and supply services' as contended by the Revenue. The agreement indicated that the appellant was responsible for cleaning operations as a lump sum job, with payment based on actual wages plus a service charge. Despite the institution's involvement in personnel selection, the appellant retained control over maintaining cleanliness. Consequently, the Tribunal granted the appellant's request for waiving the pre-deposit and stayed the recovery of the adjudged amounts pending appeal resolution. en-us Thu, 26 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202948 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the services provided did not fall under 'manpower recruitment and supply services' as contended by the Revenue. The agreement indicated that the appellant was responsible for cleaning operations as a lump sum job, with payment based on actual wages plus a service charge. Despite the institution's involvement in personnel selection, the appellant retained control over maintaining cleanliness. Consequently, the Tribunal granted the appellant's request for waiving the pre-deposit and stayed the recovery of the adjudged amounts pending appeal resolution. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 26 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202948