<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 418 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202939</link>
    <description>Judicial discipline requires an assessing authority to implement an appellate Commissioner&#039;s order granting benefit under Notification No. 6/2006-C.E. after classification of the goods under CTH 8523-51-00, and the authority cannot withhold or prejudice subsequent identical imports once Revenue&#039;s stay request has been rejected. The Tribunal treated non-implementation as impermissible and prejudicial to the importer&#039;s rights flowing from the appellate order. It also allowed the respondent&#039;s request for an out-of-turn hearing and directed early listing of the Revenue appeal so the dispute could be promptly adjudicated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 418 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202939</link>
      <description>Judicial discipline requires an assessing authority to implement an appellate Commissioner&#039;s order granting benefit under Notification No. 6/2006-C.E. after classification of the goods under CTH 8523-51-00, and the authority cannot withhold or prejudice subsequent identical imports once Revenue&#039;s stay request has been rejected. The Tribunal treated non-implementation as impermissible and prejudicial to the importer&#039;s rights flowing from the appellate order. It also allowed the respondent&#039;s request for an out-of-turn hearing and directed early listing of the Revenue appeal so the dispute could be promptly adjudicated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>