<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 439 - ITAT, COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202935</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by ruling in favor of the assessee on the Section 10A deduction issue. It held that profits from eligible units should be computed separately without adjustment for losses from non-eligible units. However, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on the lease rent claim, stating it was not maintainable as relevant facts were not presented during assessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 439 - ITAT, COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202935</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by ruling in favor of the assessee on the Section 10A deduction issue. It held that profits from eligible units should be computed separately without adjustment for losses from non-eligible units. However, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on the lease rent claim, stating it was not maintainable as relevant facts were not presented during assessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>