<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 717 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202927</link>
    <description>The lower appellate authority failed to specify the tax amount and penalties under different sections of the Finance Act, 1994. The case is remanded to the original authority for clarification. The Department&#039;s appeal is granted for remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 17:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 717 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202927</link>
      <description>The lower appellate authority failed to specify the tax amount and penalties under different sections of the Finance Act, 1994. The case is remanded to the original authority for clarification. The Department&#039;s appeal is granted for remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>