<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 417 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202920</link>
    <description>Availability of an alternative statutory remedy does not automatically bar writ jurisdiction, particularly where the impugned order is based on a record-based error or other exceptional circumstances warranting judicial review. The Tribunal refused to condone delay on the footing that no medical certificate was filed, but the original record contained the certificate. On that basis, the refusal to consider the delay application on the correct record could not be sustained, and the matter was remitted for fresh decision after hearing both sides.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 17:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 417 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202920</link>
      <description>Availability of an alternative statutory remedy does not automatically bar writ jurisdiction, particularly where the impugned order is based on a record-based error or other exceptional circumstances warranting judicial review. The Tribunal refused to condone delay on the footing that no medical certificate was filed, but the original record contained the certificate. On that basis, the refusal to consider the delay application on the correct record could not be sustained, and the matter was remitted for fresh decision after hearing both sides.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>