<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 64 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202904</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that embossing and cutting to shape of Aluminium foil for packing cigarettes does not amount to manufacturing for excise duty purposes. The Court emphasized that the process must result in a distinct and marketable commodity to be considered manufacturing, which was not the case with the embossing and cutting of the foil. The appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise was dismissed, affirming the decision in favor of the respondent, a manufacturer of cigarettes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 64 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202904</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that embossing and cutting to shape of Aluminium foil for packing cigarettes does not amount to manufacturing for excise duty purposes. The Court emphasized that the process must result in a distinct and marketable commodity to be considered manufacturing, which was not the case with the embossing and cutting of the foil. The appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise was dismissed, affirming the decision in favor of the respondent, a manufacturer of cigarettes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>