https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202894 The appellant challenged the order of adjudication demanding service tax and penalties, which led to the dismissal of the appeal due to non-compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal granted waiver of pre-deposit for the period before 10.9.2004, ruling that the appellant was not liable to pay service tax for the erection part of the work. The appeal was allowed, remanding the matter for further consideration without additional pre-deposit, ensuring a fair hearing opportunity for the appellant. en-us Mon, 27 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Dec 2011 14:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202894 The appellant challenged the order of adjudication demanding service tax and penalties, which led to the dismissal of the appeal due to non-compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal granted waiver of pre-deposit for the period before 10.9.2004, ruling that the appellant was not liable to pay service tax for the erection part of the work. The appeal was allowed, remanding the matter for further consideration without additional pre-deposit, ensuring a fair hearing opportunity for the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 27 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202894