<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 414 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202883</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside most confiscations and penalties, except for duty demand and penalty for shortages and excesses. The judgment emphasized the significance of accurate declaration, subsequent fulfillment of import conditions, and the requirement of evidence to justify confiscation decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 18:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 414 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202883</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside most confiscations and penalties, except for duty demand and penalty for shortages and excesses. The judgment emphasized the significance of accurate declaration, subsequent fulfillment of import conditions, and the requirement of evidence to justify confiscation decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>