<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 483 - Delhi High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202878</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on all issues, including assessing income under &quot;Income from other sources&quot; instead of real estate business, treating a bad debt claim as a business loss, rejecting the addition of unclaimed liability under section 41(1) of the Act, and allowing deduction for interest paid to the bank. The Court found no substantial question of law for consideration and dismissed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 15:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 483 - Delhi High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202878</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on all issues, including assessing income under &quot;Income from other sources&quot; instead of real estate business, treating a bad debt claim as a business loss, rejecting the addition of unclaimed liability under section 41(1) of the Act, and allowing deduction for interest paid to the bank. The Court found no substantial question of law for consideration and dismissed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>