<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 5 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202876</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the revenue, holding that the assessee was not entitled to deductions under sections 80HH and 80-I of the Income-tax Act as the machinery was not considered new and had been installed in the previous assessment year. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to grant relief was overturned, and it was concluded that the Assessing Officer was justified in denying the deductions due to the old machinery&#039;s value exceeding 20% of the total machinery value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 08:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 5 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202876</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the revenue, holding that the assessee was not entitled to deductions under sections 80HH and 80-I of the Income-tax Act as the machinery was not considered new and had been installed in the previous assessment year. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to grant relief was overturned, and it was concluded that the Assessing Officer was justified in denying the deductions due to the old machinery&#039;s value exceeding 20% of the total machinery value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>