<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 485 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202873</link>
    <description>Disputed service tax on commission, rate difference and turnover bonus was found insufficiently examined because the earlier orders had not properly considered the appellant&#039;s factual and legal submissions or the documentary material. The matter was therefore treated as fit for de novo adjudication, with the appellant to be heard afresh and the adjudicating authority required to pass a reasoned order after analysing all relevant facts and legal provisions. On that basis, the balance pre-deposit was waived, stay was granted and the case was remanded for decision on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 485 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202873</link>
      <description>Disputed service tax on commission, rate difference and turnover bonus was found insufficiently examined because the earlier orders had not properly considered the appellant&#039;s factual and legal submissions or the documentary material. The matter was therefore treated as fit for de novo adjudication, with the appellant to be heard afresh and the adjudicating authority required to pass a reasoned order after analysing all relevant facts and legal provisions. On that basis, the balance pre-deposit was waived, stay was granted and the case was remanded for decision on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>