https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202870 The clearance-value computation was sent back for fresh consideration because a later Tribunal decision relied on by the assessee was not available when the Commissioner (Appeals) passed the order. The Tribunal noted that the Commissioner (Appeals) had already remanded the matter for re-quantification, and held that the original adjudicating authority should reconsider the entire issue afresh after giving the assessee due opportunity. The impugned order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded to the original adjudicating authority with all issues kept open. en-us Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Mar 2011 13:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202870 The clearance-value computation was sent back for fresh consideration because a later Tribunal decision relied on by the assessee was not available when the Commissioner (Appeals) passed the order. The Tribunal noted that the Commissioner (Appeals) had already remanded the matter for re-quantification, and held that the original adjudicating authority should reconsider the entire issue afresh after giving the assessee due opportunity. The impugned order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded to the original adjudicating authority with all issues kept open. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202870